Abstract:
We examine whether, relative to their global peers, the financial performance of firms from developing countries leads to increases in human rights abuses. We also study the institutional conditions that qualify this relationship. Based on a combination of behavioral and neo-institutional theories, we suggest there is a positive relationship between financial performance and human rights misbehavior as home country liabilities motivate firms to misbehave to achieve their primary goal of economic leadership. We also suggest that strong regulatory and normative pressures attenuate the abovementioned positive relationship, as failure to comply with norms endangers such firms’ secondary goal of achieving international legitimacy. Our analysis, based on a sample of 245 large companies from eight developing countries studied over a 20-year period, supports our hypotheses. Our empirical results suggest that such companies misbehave when they endeavor to strike a balance between maintaining their global economic leadership and sustaining their social legitimacy.
The article is available online here.
The Keynesian Working Group is happy to announce a call for papers to the YSI…
The 2024 Hukum Chandra Memorial Prize selection committee unanimously agreed to award Dr. Nicola Salvati,…
The Regional Science Association International (RSAI) chose the Paper "Quality of government and women's political…
Giulia Rossello and Arianna Martinelli have published their article "Breach of academic values and misconduct:…
This edited compilation invites authors involved in empirical research on business, human rights and/or the…
Research Topic: Human rights violations by companies are at the heart of the European Directive…