A new publication by Angela Parenti, Simone Lazzini, Zeila Occhipinti & Roberto Verona:
“Disentangling economic crisis effects from environmental regulation effects: Implications for sustainable development”
Abstract
With climate change becoming more severe, policy makers must impose environmental regulations that will lead firms to adopt sustainable corporate models. According to the Porter hypothesis, environmental regulation can favour the implementation of business strategies that improve economic and environmental performances. In this study, we examine how one such form of regulation, the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS), impacts firm performance, and we subsequently widen the examination beyond the regulation to evaluate an economic crisis which could potentially confound regulation effects. We estimate a panel model with time‐ and firm‐fixed effects for different subsamples that disentangle the effect of the EU ETS policy from the 2008 economic crisis. The results indicate that the EU ETS policy in its third phase can activate the Porter hypothesis and is effective in fuelling the implementation of sustainable corporate models by firms. However, we also find that the economic crisis neutralises the effects of the regulation on firm performance, precluding the triggering of the Porter hypothesis in severely affected firms.
The article is available online here.
The Keynesian Working Group is happy to announce a call for papers to the YSI…
The 2024 Hukum Chandra Memorial Prize selection committee unanimously agreed to award Dr. Nicola Salvati,…
The Regional Science Association International (RSAI) chose the Paper "Quality of government and women's political…
Giulia Rossello and Arianna Martinelli have published their article "Breach of academic values and misconduct:…
This edited compilation invites authors involved in empirical research on business, human rights and/or the…
Research Topic: Human rights violations by companies are at the heart of the European Directive…