Giulia Rossello and Arianna Martinelli have published their article “Breach of academic values and misconduct: the case of Sci-Hub” in Scientometrics.
Abstract
This paper investigates the growing evidence of research-related misconduct by developing and testing a theoretical framework. We study the deep causes of misconduct by asking whether the perception of an erosion of the core academic values, formally an ideology-based psychological contract breach, is associated with research-related misconduct. We test our framework by examining the use of Sci-Hub and providing empirical evidence that the loss of faith in scientific research sparkles research-related misconduct against publishers. Based on a stratified sample of 2849 academics working in 30 institutions in 6 European countries, we find that ideology-based psychological contract breach explains Sci-Hub usage, also when controlling for other possible motivations. The magnitude of the effect depends on contextual and demographic characteristics. Females, foreign, and tenured scholars are less likely to download papers illegally when experiencing a contract breach of academic values. Our results suggest that policies restoring academic values might also address research-related misconduct.
The Keynesian Working Group is happy to announce a call for papers to the YSI…
The 2024 Hukum Chandra Memorial Prize selection committee unanimously agreed to award Dr. Nicola Salvati,…
The Regional Science Association International (RSAI) chose the Paper "Quality of government and women's political…
This edited compilation invites authors involved in empirical research on business, human rights and/or the…
Research Topic: Human rights violations by companies are at the heart of the European Directive…
Vicente Rios, Izaskun Barba, Lisa Gianmoena and Pedro Pascual have published their new article “Clearing…